Moral imagination is our ability to think outside the box and envision ways to be both ethical and successful.
1. Can you think of a time when you or someone whom you know used moral imagination? If so, what motivated you (or this individual) to use moral imagination?
2. What kind of organizational context would encourage the use of moral imagination?
3. What can leaders do to encourage the people who work for them to use moral imagination?
4. The video suggests that it often takes courage to exercise moral imagination. What kind of things would give people the courage to use moral imagination?
5. The video suggests that moral imagination may require one to buck the status quo. What can one do to learn how to move beyond the status quo and do things differently?
6. What does moral imagination have in common with other types of creativity and innovation?
The Animal Foundation is a nonprofit organization operating Nevada’s largest open-admission animal shelter, the Lied Animal Shelter and pet adoption center. The Lied Animal Shelter is located in Las Vegas and is financed by taxpayers, grants, and individual donors. It provides a refuge for thousands of lost, unwanted, neglected, and abandoned animals every year.
In recent years, the Lied Animal Shelter has been plagued by a variety of problems from overcrowding due to a spike in animal intake as residents in the greater Las Vegas area (Clark County) surrendered or lost their pets. Analysts believed that the recession of 2008 was a major contributing factor to pet abandonment. April Corbin, writing for Las Vegas Weekly, reported:
“The Las Vegas Valley has a problem with domestic animals: we have more that we seem able or willing to handle, and those without homes mostly end up at the Lied Shelter. On any given day, it may be the busiest animal holding facility in the nation. …Some blame the recession, which led to the foreclosures of more than 150,000 homes in Clark County between January 2007 and May 2014, triggering the wholesale abandonment of animals.”
In 2013, the Lied Animal Shelter took in over 40,000 abandoned or lost animals. From that population, more than 10,000 animals were adopted, nearly 5,000 were reunited with their owners, and over 2,500 were transferred to other facilities. But 21,000 animals—more than half of the animals brought to the shelter—were euthanized. Many in Clark County were discouraged by the seemingly insurmountable problems that the Lied Animal Shelter faced.
Leaders at R&R Partners, a full-service, international advertising agency headquartered in Las Vegas, believed that their persuasive communication skills could help solve Animal Foundation’s problem. R&R took on the nonprofit as a pro bono client with goals of promoting pet ownership and driving traffic to the Animal Foundation’s pet adoption website, NewPetNow.com. The agency staff conducted qualitative research in the form of focus groups with R&R employees who were pet owners. They came up with the strategy of framing pet adoption not about love and companionship but about pets’ many household uses (e.g., alarm system, sleeping mask, vacuum cleaner) with a tongue-in-cheek tone. The agency staff created an integrated communication campaign of “In-FUR-mercial” spoofs that portrayed pets as multi-purpose products for the home. Below are links to examples of the “Pet Dog” and “Pet Cat” In-FUR-mercials, and examples of print ads (Exhibits 1 and 2) follow in the Reference section.
After the release of the ads in early 2015, the campaign immediately received critical acclaim from industry analysts. ADWEEK contributor Gabriel Beltrone stated, “The writing is sharp and funny, the acting perfectly overdone, and the voiceover as cheesy as possible—dead-on parody.” The In-FUR-mercials also received CynopsisMedia’s award for the Best 30-Second Spot.
The campaign connected with audiences in Las Vegas and generated positive press for the Animal Foundation and the Lied Shelter, helping them to achieve their goal of increasing pet adoption. The percentage of available pets adopted increased by 9.39 percent during 2015, which meant that more than 1,000 additional animals were adopted.
Leaders at R&R Partners acknowledged that the campaign also resulted in important benefits for the agency that extended beyond the success and visibility of the campaign. Morale and comraderie within the agency were increased and the agency’s reputation as a responsible corporate citizen was reinforced. Sarah Catletti, an account supervisor at R&R Partners, described the benefits to the agency:
“Welcoming the Animal Foundation to R&R Vegas’ list of clients was a great way to boost morale within the agency. The pro bono client was chosen through an employee voting system. Since the Animal Foundation was the organization that received the largest number of votes, the entire agency was invested and excited to hear about the work, even those who weren’t directly involved with the account.”
1. What is moral imagination? In your opinion, did the employees at R&R Partners exercise moral imagination in the work that they did for the Animal Foundation? Why or why not?
2. What benefits did the “In-FUR-mercial” campaign provide and for whom? Explain.
3. In this case study, what did moral imagination have in common with other types of creativity and innovation? Explain.
4. This case is about pro bono work that an advertising agency did for a pro bono client. That is, the agency did the work for free. Do you think that an advertising agency could exercise moral imagination in its work for corporate clients that pay the agency? If so, how? If not, why?
5. Can you think of an example of another company or advertising campaign that has demonstrated moral imagination? Explain.
The Animal Foundation’s 2013 Annual Report
About The Animal Foundation
Pets are Exciting Multi-use Tools in these Fantastic Infomercials for an Animal Shelter: Every House Needs One
The No-Kill Dilemma: Can Las Vegas Save All Its Shelter Animals?
Animal Shelter Infomercial Spoofs Show Incredible Household Uses for Cats and Dogs
This video introduces the behavioral ethics concept known as moral imagination. Moral imagination is our ability to think outside the box and envision ways to be both ethical and successful. Moral imagination is illustrated in two forms in the video: (1) find a way to be both ethical and successful (for example, the advertising agency CEO who resigned a big client rather than do something unethical that the client was insisting that he do and found a way to cut costs, pitch new business, and keep everyone employed); and (2) find a way to make money and serve society (for example, TOMS Shoes one-for-one donation; for each pair of TOMS shoes sold, the company donates a pair to someone in need). Making a distinction between these two forms of moral imagination can be helpful; the former involves integrity, while the latter involves corporate social responsibility.
Advertising practitioners who use moral imagination tend to work in advertising agencies that encourage moral sensitivity. In these agencies, organizational values related to ethics are clearly articulated and broadly embraced. Advertising practitioners in these agencies often talk about ethical issues with their co-workers and their clients, and they view providing ethics counsel to their clients as part of their roles as trusted business advisors.
This video is a part of the three-video Moral Trilogy package. The three videos in the Moral TrilogyMoral Myopia, Moral Muteness, and Moral Imagination (this video)are intended to be used together. Moral myopia and moral muteness often reinforce each other, while breaking free of moral myopia and moral muteness can enable one to develop moral imagination.
The case study on this page, In-FUR-mercials: Advertising & Adoption, shows how an advertising agency used its moral imagination to increase pet adoptions at the Lied Animal Shelter when the shelter faced a spike in animal intake. For a case study that illustrates how companies can benefit from moral imagination, read The Costco Model.
Terms defined in our ethics glossary that are related to the video and case studies include: corporate social responsibility, integrity, moral imagination, moral muteness, and moral myopia.
The three behavioral ethics concepts in the Moral Trilogy and many of the rationalizations that underpin them are described and documented in an article published in the Journal of Advertising by Minette Drumwright and Patrick Murphy (see Additional Resources).
Behavioral ethics draws upon behavioral psychology, cognitive science, evolutionary biology, and related disciplines to determine how and why people make the ethical and unethical decisions that they do. Much behavioral ethics research addresses the question of why good people do bad things. Many behavioral ethics concepts are explored in detail in Concepts Unwrapped, as well as in the video case study In It to Win: The Jack Abramoff Story. Anyone who watches all (or even a good part) of these videos will have a solid introduction to behavioral ethics.
Bird, Frederick B., and James A. Waters. 1989. The Moral Muteness Of Managers. California Management Review 32 (1): 73-88.
Drumwright, Minette E., and Patrick E. Murphy. 2004. How Advertising Practitioners View Ethics: Moral Muteness, Moral Myopia, and Moral Imagination. Journal of Advertising 33 (2): 7-24.
Gentile, Mary C. 2010. Keeping Your Colleagues Honest: How to Challenge Unethical Behavior at WorkAnd Prevail. Harvard Business Review 88 (3): 114-117.
Gentile, Mary C. 2010. Giving Voice to Values: How to Speak Your Mind When You Know Whats Right. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Prentice, Robert. 2004. Teaching Ethics, Heuristics And Biases. Journal Of Business Ethics Education 1 (1): 57-74.
Werhane, Patricia H. 1999. Moral Imagination And Management Decision-Making. New York: Oxford University Press.
See the Giving Voice To Values (GVV) Curriculum for cases that provide evidence of Moral Myopia and Moral Muteness. All GVV curriculum materials are free to instructors and students here:
Especially see the GVV cases written by Minette E. Drumwright and her students, Part-Time Job With A Full-Time Challenge, Market Research Deception, Student Privileges With Strings Attached, and Online Identities (A) & (B).
News Stories On Scandals:
Barrett, Paul M. 2014. The Scandal Bowl: Tar Heels Football, Academic Fraud, and Implicit Racism. Businessweek, January 2.
Belson, Ken. 2012. Sanduskys Trial Begins With Graphic Testimony. New York Times, June 11.
Boren, Cindy. 2013. A Brief History of Lance Armstrong Denying Doping Allegations. Washington Post, January 14.
Associated Press. 2013. Lance Armstrong Doping Denials Over the Years. Huffington Post, January 16.
The latest teaching resource from Ethics Unwrapped is an article, written by Cara Biasucci and Robert Prentice, that describes the basics of behavioral ethics, introduces the videos and supporting materials along with teaching examples, and includes data on the efficacy of Ethics Unwrapped for improving ethics pedagogy across disciplines. It was published in Journal of Business Law and Ethics Pedagogy (Vol. 1, August 2018), and can be downloaded here: “Teaching Behavioral Ethics (Using “Ethics Unwrapped” Videos and Educational Materials).”
For more resources on teaching behavioral ethics, an article written by Ethics Unwrapped authors Minette Drumwright, Robert Prentice, and Cara Biasucci introduces key concepts in behavioral ethics and approaches to effective ethics instructionincluding sample classroom assignments. The article, published in the Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, may be downloaded here: Behavioral Ethics and Teaching Ethical Decision Making.
A detailed article by Robert Prentice with extensive resources for teaching behavioral ethics, published in Journal of Legal Studies Education, may be downloaded here: Teaching Behavioral Ethics.
An article by Robert Prentice discussing how behavioral ethics can improve the ethicality of human decision-making, published in the Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, may be downloaded here: Behavioral Ethics: Can It Help Lawyers (And Others) Be their Best Selves?
A dated but still serviceable introductory article about teaching behavioral ethics can be accessed through Google Scholar by searching: Prentice, Robert A. 2004. Teaching Ethics, Heuristics, and Biases. Journal of Business Ethics Education 1 (1): 57-74.
Transcript of Narration
Written and Narrated by
Minette Drumwright, Ph.D., M.B.A.
Department of Advertising and Public Relations
Moody College of Communication
The University of Texas at Austin
“It can be difficult to have integrity in the workplace at times, especially when it seems that many people are succeeding through unethical behavior. It can be tempting to throw up your hands and say, Ive got to be unethical if I want to succeed! or If Im ethical, Ill go broke! This type of thinking creates a false dichotomy between being ethical and failing OR being unethical and succeeding.
Some people are able to break out of this type of thinking, even in very tough circumstances. They have what scholars such as Mark Johnson and Patricia Werhane have referred to as moral imagination. Moral imagination is the ability to think outside the box and envision ways to be both ethical and successfulalternatives that many people cannot even imagine.
I encountered a vivid example of moral imagination in my research with Patrick Murphy that was published in Journal of Advertising. The CEO of a major advertising agency described a time in which his largest client, who accounted for more than a third of his agencys revenues, asked him to do something he considered unethical. He objected, but the client dug in his heels and insisted that the advertising agency carry out the unethical behavior. As they parted, the client said that they would revisit the issue at a meeting the next day, and he also commented that he was confident that the CEO would change his mind and comply with his request, especially if he wanted their relationship to continue.
The CEO went back to the office and discussed the clients request at length with his team. After a good deal of deliberation, they came to the conclusion that they could not comply with the request. At the meeting the next day, the CEO used his most persuasive arguments in objecting to the behavior, but the client stood firm. The CEO resigned the account just before the client fired him. Suddenly, one-third of the agencys revenue disappeared. Typically, in a situation like this in advertising, most if not all of the people working on the account get pink slips; they are fired to reduce the agencys fixed costs dramatically and immediately. The CEO said that he did not believe that this was the right thing to do. He gathered his team together, and they brainstormed ways to cut costs and pitch new business. And then they did those things. In the end, no one was fired, and the agency made it through the crisis successfully with its credibility and its reputation intact. In my research in this ad agency, many people recounted this same story to me. It had become a legend that embodied and communicated the values of the organization. Moral imagination not only helps people deal with ethical issues that they face in the workplace but also it helps businesses act more ethically in society.
So what can we do to develop moral imagination? First, reject the false dichotomy that we have to either be ethical and go broke or to be unethical and successful. Second, accept the fact that ethical problem solving is a part of our role as professionals and apply the same problem solving skills and approaches to ethical issues as we do to other issues. Recognize that if we want to be trusted business partners, we must deal effectively with ethical issues. Third, talk with other people who share our perspective about the importance of finding ethical approaches and brainstorm alternatives. And finally, have courage! We can have the best values in the world, but they dont do anyone any good if we dont have the courage to put them into action.”