Skip to main content

Tragedy of the Commons

The Tragedy of the Commons describes a situation where a shared resource is exploited – because of individual self-interest – and damages overall social welfare.

Tragedy of the Commons

The Tragedy of the Commons describes a situation where a shared resource is exploited – because of individual self-interest – and damages overall social welfare. The air we breathe and the water we drink are just two examples of what we call “Commons.” Tragedy of the Commons is an important phenomenon with moral dimensions.

Garrett Hardin, who coined the term, used the example of a pasture that all shepherds can access. Because the shepherds are all selfishly motivated to graze their animals as much as possible for short-term gain, the pasture is quickly overgrazed and depleted. The overall community suffers.

Some people believe that converting shared public resources into private property motivates owners to preserve those resources for society. Others believe that government regulation is a better solution. Both strategies have limitations.

There are no easy fixes to the Tragedy of the Commons. But prosocial behavior can help. Elinor Ostrom won a Nobel Prize for studying how communities often voluntarily work together to prevent overconsumption, and to create a stable, common pool of resources.

Whatever the strategy, most philosophers agree that we have a moral duty to overcome this tragic phenomenon and to preserve shared resources for the common good.

Bibliography

Garrett Hardin, The Tragedy of the Commons, 162 Nature 1243 (1968).

Elinor Ostrom, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (1990).

Amy Sinden, The Tragedy of the Commons and the Myth of a Private Property Solution, 78 Colorado Law Review 533 (2007).

Sustainability

Sustainability

Sustainability is living to meet the needs of the present generation without depleting the resources that future generations will need to meet their needs.

View

Tangible & Abstract

Tangible & Abstract

The Tangible & Abstract describes how people may make moral errors by focusing too much on immediate factors that are close in time and geography and too little on more abstract factors that are removed in time and place.

View