In It To Win: Jack & Role Morality Abramoff’s version of role morality, which is our tendency to use different moral standards as we play different “roles” in society. View
In It To Win: Jack & Self-Serving Bias Abramoff’s version of the self-serving bias, which causes us to see things in ways that support our best interests and our pre-existing beliefs. View
In It To Win: Jack & Overconfidence Bias Abramoff’s version of overconfidence bias, which is our tendency to be more confident about our moral character and our ability to act ethically than is objectively justified. View
In It To Win: Jack & Rationalizations Abramoff’s version of rationalizations, which are the excuses we make for not living up to our own, or society’s, ethical standards. View
In It To Win: Jack & Framing Abramoff’s version of framing, which describes how our judgments, including our ethical judgments, are affected just by how a situation is posed or viewed. View
In It To Win: The Jack Abramoff Story Featuring former lobbyist and convicted felon Jack Abramoff, this 25-minute documentary explores the biases and pressures he faced, and the consequences of his unethical decisions. View
Bounded Ethicality Bounded ethicality explains how social pressures and psychological processes cause us to behave in ways that are inconsistent with our own values. View
Conflict of Interest Conflict of interest arises when we have incentives that conflict with our professional duties and responsibilities in ways that harm others and society. View
Conformity Bias Conformity bias describes our tendency to take cues for proper behavior from the actions of others rather than exercise our own independent judgment. View
Ethical Fading Ethical fading occurs when we are so focused on other aspects of a decision that its ethical dimensions fade from view. View